首球还是没来！英超官方认定维尔茨进球为对方球员乌龙（首球仍未敲开 英超官方将维尔茨破门改判对方乌龙）
2026-01-18
Explaining goal accreditation rules I want to clarify the rules around goal accreditation in the Premier League. The Goal Accreditation Panel can attribute a goal as an own goal if the initial shot was off-target, but if it’s on-target, it gets credited to the attacker. A significant deflection may still count as an own goal if the original shot was off-target, while a save rebound off a defender counts as a goal for the scorer if the initial shot was on target. It’s a nuanced area.Clarifying goal ruling response I should respond by explaining the ruling and showing sympathy while noting that Wirtz's first EPL goal is still pending due to being credited as an own goal. Since this is likely a conversational message, I could ask which match they’re referring to and provide some guidelines. I need to keep it minimal but helpful. A clarifying question could be: “Do you want confirmation, rule interpretation, or statistical impact?” It’s essential to avoid false claims about any specific match. Let’s keep things concise!Creating a concise response I can mention the "Dubious Goals Committee," which is now known as the "Premier League Match Centre and Goal Accreditation Panel," but I’ll refer to it generically as "进球认定小组" in Chinese. I’ll keep the response concise, using bullet points with no heavy formatting, aiming for 4-6 points. The points will include: No need to execute any commands since the user hasn’t requested file changes. Let’s proceed!
确实郁闷。按英超的进球认定规则，这种被改判为乌龙通常是因为下面这些情况之一：
- 攻方的原始射门被判“偏出门框范围”，随后因防守队员的触碰才入网 → 记对方乌龙
- 原射门方向不明或被巨大改变（大幅度折射），无法认定会直接进门 → 倾向判乌龙
- 若原射门在门框范围内，仅轻微折射或碰防守队员但仍会进 → 一般仍记在射门球员名下
影响：
- 球员个人进球数与里程碑（比如“英超首球”）不会增加
- FPL/数据平台会同步调整得分与统计
你想确认具体是哪场比赛、哪一分钟的那个球吗？给我对阵信息或链接，我可以帮你查官方比赛报告和判定说明，看看是否有后续复核的可能。
